There can be little doubt that Fed Chairman Benjamin Bernanke has been
a very, very good friend to gold investors. However, some of those who
have benefited from his largesse now fear that the recent selloff in
gold indicates an imminent end to Bernanke's monetary high-wire act.
Most assume that a cessation of the Fed's stimulative efforts, if it
were to occur, would spell the end of gold's bull run. But a closer
reading of Bernanke's economic philosophy and the Fed's own recent
history, shows that once a central banker begins a strenuous routine,
it is very hard, if not impossible, for them to dismount.
It is widely believed that the unemployment rate, core inflation and
home prices are the three key pieces of economic data that Bernanke
and his Fed cohorts rely upon when formulating monetary policy.
Although other data points, such as regional manufacturing surveys and
the producer price index (which have rebounded significantly in some
cases) attract some attention, they do not carry near the weight of
the big three. With the unemployment rate remaining north of 9.4%, YOY
core CPI inflation still less than 1% and the Case/Shiller Home Price
Index down .8% from the year ago period, the Fed is in no mood to
downshift. If anything, my guess is that Bernanke will step on the
gas.
More importantly, in light of Bernanke's often stated conclusion
that premature Fed tightening in 1937 and 1938 led to a prolongation
of the Great Depression, even if the big three metrics were to show
marked improvement, any future increase in interest rates will be
moderate and held in abeyance for as long as politically possible.
Despite the fact that some economic data is improving, the foundation
of the economy is getting worse. Consumers are now increasing their
borrowing again–as evidenced by last week's number on consumer
credit–and our government is now massively overleveraged. But
leaving alone the deteriorating nature of these forward looking
metrics, the Fed's own history provides unexpected good news for
those holding tight to their gold positions.
The Fed began its last round of rate hikes in June of 2004 when Fed
Chairman Alan Greenspan began a sequence of consecutive 25 basis point
increases. The Maestro bumped rates 14 times before passing the baton
to Bernanke in February of 2006, who continued the program with three
more ¼ point increases. The combined efforts took rates from 1% to
5.25% in the span of two years. However, the tightening program did
nothing to tarnish the luster of gold. Here's why.
Since the Fed increased interest rates very slowly from an extremely
low level, money supply continued to expand during the long, slow,
deliberate campaign of 25 basis point increases. From June 2004
through June 2006 the M2 money supply increased 9.3%, rising from
$6.27 trillion to $6.85 trillion. Total loans and leases from
commercial banks jumped from $4.61 trillion to $5.71 trillion during
that same time period, an increase of 24%. As a result, over the time
that the Fed's dynamic duo waged their phony war against the asset
bubbles of the mid 2000's, the price of gold increased from $395 to
$623 per ounce.
The truth is that increases in money supply and bank lending aren't
curtailed very much by a Fed Funds target rate that is increased very
slowly from a starting point that is decidedly below the rate of
inflation. Currently, Fed Funds *is* decidedly below the rate of
inflation, and is likely to stay there for some time. Therefore,
investors need not necessarily fear a run on gold once Bernanke
eventually lifts rates from zero percent….if he ever makes that
decision.
In addition, investors should keep their eyes on the damage created by
these ultra low rates. An enormously destructive housing bubble grew
out 1% and 1.5% rates that were in place from November of 2002 thru
August of 2004. In our current round, the Fed has kept interest rates
near zero since December 2008…more than two years! Why should we
expect a different outcome this time around?
A key point to mention is that the credit crisis and collapse of the
housing market were not caused by a the Fed bringing rates to 5.25%.
Rather real estate prices simply went too high because rates were too
low in the years prior. The low rates were the problem. And once home
prices became unaffordable to most consumers, banks then became
insolvent because millions defaulted on mortgages. After their capital
became significantly eroded they were subsequently unable to lend.
The bottom line is that if Bernanke should ever attempt a
"dismount" from massive monetary easing, investors should take
solace not because he is likely to "stick" the landing, but
because the exercise will likely be so futile that owners of gold
should continue to shine.
Source: Forbes.com
