Showing posts with label Mutual Funds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mutual Funds. Show all posts

Are the mutual fund's days numbered?

By Penelope Wang, senior writerJune 21, 2010: 2:26 PM ET
(Money Magazine) -- Ever since exchange-traded funds were created in
the early 1990s, they've been seen as a threat to old-fashioned mutual
funds. That's because ETFs can offer you instant exposure to a wide
range of investments -- from the broad stock and bond markets to
individual sectors to niche strategies -- all with a single trade.

At the same time, they're not as likely to expose you to as big a tax
hit as a traditional fund, and they're often a cheaper bet. The
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF, for instance, charges annual fees
that are less than half of what its mutual fund sibling levies. To top
it off, ETFs can be bought and sold throughout the trading day, just
as stocks can. Traditional funds can be bought or sold only once daily
at the closing price.

Yet despite these advantages, ETFs have always come with a major
drawback. For as long as they've been around, you've had to pay
commissions to a brokerage anytime you bought or sold these shares. So
if you invest small amounts monthly, those charges could swamp the
other cost advantages of an ETF.

But that's starting to change. In May, Vanguard said it would lift
commissions on trades for all 46 of the ETFs it runs. That follows
recent moves at Fidelity, which started offering commission-free
trades for 25 BlackRock iShares ETFs, and at Schwab, which removed
trading fees on its line of ETFs in November.

*Advantage: ETFs*
Even before this development, there were plenty of signs that ETFs had
been gaining ground. "With commissions going away, ETFs will gain
market share over funds even more quickly," says Princeton economics
professor Burton Malkiel, author of _A Random Walk Down Wall Street_
(who also founded an ETF provider). That's because investors will
start to wonder if they really even need to own traditional funds
anymore.

Well, do you? Probably not -- at least if you plan to invest in
broad-based ETFs. Those that track established benchmarks like the S&P
500 or the MSCI EAFE index of foreign stocks tend to be dirt cheap.
For example, the average ETF that follows a U.S. broad market index
charges just 0.36% in annual fees, vs. 0.66% for similar mutual funds.
Also, if you make frequent trades or if you rebalance a multifund
portfolio often -- say, at least twice a year -- you don't need
traditional funds anymore. And if you like to place bets on individual
sectors, like technology or health care, commission-free ETFs would
seem to make a lot of sense now. After all, you can invest in the
Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF for 0.21% a year, while the typical
tech-sector fund charges 1.6%.

The risk, of course, is that you can easily get carried away and
narrow-cast your portfolio into oblivion. These days you can find ETFs
that give you exposure to such fare as North American multimedia
companies and Japanese small-cap dividend-paying stocks. Start to play
too many hunches and you may be better off just going to the track.

*What you need to know*
Even if you don't have a gambling problem, there are certain things to
keep in mind with ETFs.
For starters, while it may make sense to put new money to work in
them, converting an existing portfolio of funds may not be
cost-effective, since you'll take a tax hit on your gains. (There's an
exception: If you're a Vanguard index fund investor, you can convert
to the ETF class of the same portfolio, if there is one, without
incurring taxes.)

Also, few 401(k) retirement plans currently offer ETFs as investment
options. And while the overall number of ETFs is growing, if you're
looking for one that invests in both stocks and bonds, or a portfolio
managed by a stock picker, you'll probably find few choices that fit
your goals.

Another thing to keep in mind: If you have a small account or rarely
trade, you could incur other fees. At Vanguard, if your balances slip
below $50,000, you'll be assessed a $7 to $25 fee per trade on
non-Vanguard ETFs and stocks.

Finally, you have to understand how ETFs work. Like any other
investment, they come with their own set of complications.

*1. Don't go too exotic*
Normally, there's a gap between the price buyers are willing to pay
and what sellers will accept for ETF shares. Think of this as an
additional expense you have to pay.
For ETFs that invest in widely traded investments, such as S&P 500
stocks, this so-called bid/ask spread may be only a few hundredths of
a percentage point. But for less frequently traded assets, the spread
can be two or three points or more. And that's on a regular day.
In the "flash crash" of May 6, when the Dow plunged nearly 1,000
points in just a few minutes before climbing back, the exchanges ended
up canceling thousands of orders, two-thirds of them involving ETFs,
where there was a 60% gap or more between trades.

Many involved specialized ETFs, such as those that invest in specific
sectors or themes. To be fair, ETFs that track the broad market were
also affected. Still, in general it's best to play it safe by sticking
with broad-market ETFs where this spread is normally narrow.

*2. Make sure your EFT is tracking its index*
The point of an index fund is for it to perform almost exactly as the
benchmark does, since that's what you're paying for. Yet iShares MSCI
Emerging Markets ETF lagged its index by six percentage points in
2009.

This is what's known as tracking error. It occurs in all sorts of
ETFs, but can be more pronounced in those that invest in less
frequently traded securities, says investment adviser Rick Ferri,
author of The ETF Book. If your ETF consistently misses its mark --
you can check by looking up its performance and that of its index on
Morningstar.com -- consider switching to a different one or going with
a traditional fund.

*3. Be careful with commodities*
While stock index ETFs are often tax-efficient, be aware that other
types of ETFs, like those that invest in commodity futures, can
generate sizable taxable gains. Also, ETFs that hold physical
commodities, such as SPDR Gold Shares, are taxed as collectibles, so
you'll pay a 28% rate on profits, not the 15% rate on long-term
capital gains.

If you plan to invest in these types of ETFs, do it through an IRA.
That way, you'll keep more of the returns you earn. With commissions
going away, isn't that why you want an ETF in the first place?
Source: CNN.Com
READ MORE - Are the mutual fund's days numbered?

Are the mutual fund's days numbered?

By Penelope Wang, senior writerJune 21, 2010: 2:26 PM ET
(Money Magazine) -- Ever since exchange-traded funds were created in
the early 1990s, they've been seen as a threat to old-fashioned mutual
funds. That's because ETFs can offer you instant exposure to a wide
range of investments -- from the broad stock and bond markets to
individual sectors to niche strategies -- all with a single trade.

At the same time, they're not as likely to expose you to as big a tax
hit as a traditional fund, and they're often a cheaper bet. The
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF, for instance, charges annual fees
that are less than half of what its mutual fund sibling levies. To top
it off, ETFs can be bought and sold throughout the trading day, just
as stocks can. Traditional funds can be bought or sold only once daily
at the closing price.

Yet despite these advantages, ETFs have always come with a major
drawback. For as long as they've been around, you've had to pay
commissions to a brokerage anytime you bought or sold these shares. So
if you invest small amounts monthly, those charges could swamp the
other cost advantages of an ETF.

But that's starting to change. In May, Vanguard said it would lift
commissions on trades for all 46 of the ETFs it runs. That follows
recent moves at Fidelity, which started offering commission-free
trades for 25 BlackRock iShares ETFs, and at Schwab, which removed
trading fees on its line of ETFs in November.

*Advantage: ETFs*
Even before this development, there were plenty of signs that ETFs had
been gaining ground. "With commissions going away, ETFs will gain
market share over funds even more quickly," says Princeton economics
professor Burton Malkiel, author of _A Random Walk Down Wall Street_
(who also founded an ETF provider). That's because investors will
start to wonder if they really even need to own traditional funds
anymore.

Well, do you? Probably not -- at least if you plan to invest in
broad-based ETFs. Those that track established benchmarks like the S&P
500 or the MSCI EAFE index of foreign stocks tend to be dirt cheap.
For example, the average ETF that follows a U.S. broad market index
charges just 0.36% in annual fees, vs. 0.66% for similar mutual funds.
Also, if you make frequent trades or if you rebalance a multifund
portfolio often -- say, at least twice a year -- you don't need
traditional funds anymore. And if you like to place bets on individual
sectors, like technology or health care, commission-free ETFs would
seem to make a lot of sense now. After all, you can invest in the
Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF for 0.21% a year, while the typical
tech-sector fund charges 1.6%.

The risk, of course, is that you can easily get carried away and
narrow-cast your portfolio into oblivion. These days you can find ETFs
that give you exposure to such fare as North American multimedia
companies and Japanese small-cap dividend-paying stocks. Start to play
too many hunches and you may be better off just going to the track.

*What you need to know*
Even if you don't have a gambling problem, there are certain things to
keep in mind with ETFs.
For starters, while it may make sense to put new money to work in
them, converting an existing portfolio of funds may not be
cost-effective, since you'll take a tax hit on your gains. (There's an
exception: If you're a Vanguard index fund investor, you can convert
to the ETF class of the same portfolio, if there is one, without
incurring taxes.)

Also, few 401(k) retirement plans currently offer ETFs as investment
options. And while the overall number of ETFs is growing, if you're
looking for one that invests in both stocks and bonds, or a portfolio
managed by a stock picker, you'll probably find few choices that fit
your goals.

Another thing to keep in mind: If you have a small account or rarely
trade, you could incur other fees. At Vanguard, if your balances slip
below $50,000, you'll be assessed a $7 to $25 fee per trade on
non-Vanguard ETFs and stocks.
Finally, you have to understand how ETFs work. Like any other
investment, they come with their own set of complications.

*1. Don't go too exotic*
Normally, there's a gap between the price buyers are willing to pay
and what sellers will accept for ETF shares. Think of this as an
additional expense you have to pay.

For ETFs that invest in widely traded investments, such as S&P 500
stocks, this so-called bid/ask spread may be only a few hundredths of
a percentage point. But for less frequently traded assets, the spread
can be two or three points or more. And that's on a regular day.

In the "flash crash" of May 6, when the Dow plunged nearly 1,000
points in just a few minutes before climbing back, the exchanges ended
up canceling thousands of orders, two-thirds of them involving ETFs,
where there was a 60% gap or more between trades.

Many involved specialized ETFs, such as those that invest in specific
sectors or themes. To be fair, ETFs that track the broad market were
also affected. Still, in general it's best to play it safe by sticking
with broad-market ETFs where this spread is normally narrow.

*2. Make sure your EFT is tracking its index*
The point of an index fund is for it to perform almost exactly as the
benchmark does, since that's what you're paying for. Yet iShares MSCI
Emerging Markets ETF lagged its index by six percentage points in
2009.

This is what's known as tracking error. It occurs in all sorts of
ETFs, but can be more pronounced in those that invest in less
frequently traded securities, says investment adviser Rick Ferri,
author of The ETF Book. If your ETF consistently misses its mark --
you can check by looking up its performance and that of its index on
Morningstar.com -- consider switching to a different one or going with
a traditional fund.

*3. Be careful with commodities*
While stock index ETFs are often tax-efficient, be aware that other
types of ETFs, like those that invest in commodity futures, can
generate sizable taxable gains. Also, ETFs that hold physical
commodities, such as SPDR Gold Shares, are taxed as collectibles, so
you'll pay a 28% rate on profits, not the 15% rate on long-term
capital gains.

If you plan to invest in these types of ETFs, do it through an IRA.
That way, you'll keep more of the returns you earn. With commissions
going away, isn't that why you want an ETF in the first place?
Source: CNN.Com
READ MORE - Are the mutual fund's days numbered?

4 Alternatives To Traditional Mutual Funds

The first generation of mutual funds began to impress their existence
upon the public consciousness in the early 1970s. These open-ended
vehicles became widely used by both individual and institutional
investors to fund retirement plans, provide current income and
diversify small portfolios. But the 1990s saw the advent of several
new types of funds that were more streamlined, liquid and efficient
than traditional open-ended funds. This article explores several
reasons why the traditional open-ended mutual fund may be losing its
relevance. (For related reading, also check out _How To Pick A Good
Mutual Fund_.)

*TUTORIAL:* Mutual Fund Basics
*Cost Disadvantages*Although the first generation of mutual funds has
helped millions of Americans achieve their financial goals, they also
have several substantial disadvantages, such as high costs and
illiquidity. Many A-share mutual funds carry initial sales charges as
high as 5.75% and charge annual 12b-1 fees as high as 1%. B-shares
can have back-end sales charge schedules that gradually decline the
longer you hold your shares and C shares typically do not have initial
sales charges but can charge a back-end load if the shares are sold
within a short time frame. The latter two share classes also typically
have higher annual expenses than A shares. Obviously, this
substantially reduces the return on capital to the investor, both in
the short and the long term.

_Example_
John invests $100,000 in the A-share class of a growth fund. He pays
an initial sales charge of 4.75%, thus reducing his initial principal
to $95,250. The 12b-1 fees also reduce his average annual return of 8%
per year to 7.25%. If John leaves his money in the fund for 20 years,
the initial charge and lower annual return will reduce his overall
savings by nearly $80,000.

*Liquidity Disadvantages*Owners of open-ended mutual funds must also
wait until the settlement date to get their money out of the fund. An
investor who sells shares of a fund on Monday will not be able to take
constructive receipt of the sale proceeds until Thursday of the same
week, at the earliest. For investors who need to access their money
quickly for any reason, this can be a real problem.

*Forward Pricing*Mutual fund prices also lag the markets on a daily
basis. Because the portfolio managers trade securities within the
portfolio on a daily basis, it is impossible for open-ended funds to
post an intraday share price. They must instead use forward pricing,
which is based on the daily closing prices of all of the securities
within the portfolio.

*Performance Disadvantages*This is perhaps the greatest disadvantage
posed by open-ended funds. Although many funds have posted impressive
returns over five- and 10-year periods, the average annual returns of
virtually all stock funds have lagged those of the market itself over
longer periods of time. As of 2010, only one mutual fund that has
existed since 1970 has beaten the 10-year rolling return of the S&P
500 Index every single year. The rest have underperformed the markets
as a whole, which has led to the popularity of index funds that simply
invest directly in the S&P 500 or other index.

*Taxation Disadvantages*Although taxation of any type of investment
that is not housed inside a Roth IRA is inevitable, the taxation of
open-ended mutual funds is especially inevitable. Open-ended mutual
funds almost always pass on a pro-rata share of capital gains (and
losses) distributions to shareholders once each year, typically in
November. This means that any shareholder who owns shares in a taxable
account will have gains or losses to report every year. These gains or
losses may adversely affect the amount of income that the investor had
planned on reporting that year.

*Alternatives to Open-Ended Funds*Over the past 20 years, a plethora
of alternatives to open-ended funds have arisen. Although some of
these vehicles have become more popular than others, they all offer
diversification and some degree of professional management without
many of the shortcomings of open-ended funds. A list of these
includes:

*Unit Investment Trusts* *(UITs)*These instruments resemble mutual
funds in that each unit of the trust represents a portion of each
security that is held within the portfolio. However, they are more
tax-efficient than actively managed funds, although they may post
substantial gains or losses when the trust matures.

*Variable Annuity Subaccounts *These are essentially clones of
taxable retail funds, but must be treated and reported as separate
securities for regulatory reasons. Variable subaccounts have most
of the same disadvantages as open-ended funds except that they do
not post capital gains distributions.

*Closed-End Mutual Funds*
These funds have a limited number of shares than can be issued to
investors. Once all of the shares are sold, the fund is closed to new
investors and the shares begin trading in the secondary market.

* *Exchange-Traded Funds* *(ETFs)*Although this class of fund is
still the new kid on the block, ETFs have quickly become very
popular with serious investors for a number of reasons. As their
name implies, these funds trade like stocks on the major exchanges
and can be sold like any other security while the markets are
open. They provide liquidity, diversity and some degree of
professional management as well as tax efficiency in most cases.
They can be ideal instruments for tax-loss harvesting.

*Bottom Line*Although there is still a huge market for open-ended
mutual funds, their relative illiquidity, tax inefficiencies and
subpar performance compared to their benchmark indexes over time
have led to the creation of several more-efficient alternatives.
Instruments such as ETFs and UITs are rapidly increasing in
popularity and may eventually supplant their more traditional
cousins.

*by Mark P. Cussen*,CFP®, CMFC
Mark P. Cussen has more than 15 years of experience in the financial
industry, which includes working with investments, insurance,
mortgages, taxes and financial planning. He has two years of
experience in writing and editing insurance and securities test
training manuals, as well as other financial topics. He has also
worked in retail, discount and bank brokerage systems and been
involved in a venture capital enterprise in the oil and gas sector.
Cussen has a Bachelor of Science in English from the University of
Kansas and completed his CFP coursework at the Bloch School of
Business at the University of Missouri-Kansas City in August of 2001.
Source: Investopedia.Com
READ MORE - 4 Alternatives To Traditional Mutual Funds

Don't Overlook the Performance of Mutual Funds

NEW YORK (TheStreet) - The stock market is enough of a random walk so
most small investors should not try to pick stocks. So they are left
with propositions from mutual funds, ETFs, and wealth managers.
I discard wealth managers because I like, as a minimum, three-year
track records, and most do not have them. That leaves mutual funds and
ETFs.


We have all heard the arguments. ETFs are better than mutual funds
because of lower fees; because they can be bought and sold during
market hours just like stocks; and because mutual funds underperform
the indices that represent them, so why not buy the indices?


If you read much on finance, you might think ETFs had become the
investment vehicle of choice. But how pervasive have ETFs actually
become? And are they better than mutual funds?


! Data On ETFs And Mutual Funds !
Consider first U.S. household holdings of financial assets. Table 1
shows that the largest holding is pension funds. A large portion of
pension funds is invested in mutual funds. The corporate equity
category includes individual stock holdings and ETFs. The *Fed* does
not give a separate breakout for household holdings of ETFs. But
overall, it reports ETF holdings of $875 billion.


Table 2 provides data on both mutual funds and ETFs for the end of
October, 2010 as well as the change since December, 2009. Mutual fund
holdings still dwarf ETFs, but ETFs are growing more rapidly.

Even so, the absolute growth of mutual funds over the last 10 months
exceeded the growth of ETFs. The mutual fund data also reflect
investors liquidating close money substitutes at the end of the bank
panic to get back into equities.

Source: Thestreet.com
READ MORE - Don't Overlook the Performance of Mutual Funds